{"id":"W4398141237","doi":"10.1364/opticaopen.25852579","title":"Computational approach to correcting defocus and suppressing speckle noise in Line-Field Optical Coherence Tomography images","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Optical Coherence Tomography Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Optical coherence tomography; Speckle noise; Speckle pattern; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Optics; Noise (video); Line (geometry); Computer science; Computer vision; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Image (mathematics); Mathematics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005954763,0.0004400162,0.0004018655,0.0004571917,0.0003235558,0.0006781297,0.0008244299,0.0006484094,0.001056716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002100043,0.0003279555,0.0003398905,0.0003564944,0.0005868493,0.0005124835,0.0007064918,0.0006497494,0.0002662699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004920752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001263405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003143032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004623765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997779,0.00005318161,0.00001476234,0.00004158966,0.00009558942,0.00001698773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991298,0.000488971,0.00009713606,0.00009238024,0.0001656798,0.00002592567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001598667,0.00008254099,0.0008944753,0.0001082072,0.00004804776,0.00007621391,0.0001168342,0.7856044,0.04517648,0.01209632,0.0009240377,0.1547125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006818079,0.00001166671,0.0001083009,0.000002010069,0.000003406519,0.00001519452,0.000004434989,0.995101,0.003666669,0.0008083893,0.0002688769,0.000003151918],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01304256,0.0000275582,0.986221,0.00009155562,0.000006480991,0.00001733497,0.00001772688,0.0001632211,0.0004126104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1661861,0.00007001408,0.8322511,0.00007954901,0.00002292349,0.0001283779,0.0001071804,0.0000894752,0.001065312],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003143032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006249487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01601058921805065,"score_gpt":0.2598105858104822,"score_spread":0.2437999965924315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}