{"id":"W4398144151","doi":"10.1364/opticaopen.25852579.v1","title":"Computational approach to correcting defocus and suppressing speckle noise in Line-Field Optical Coherence Tomography images","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Optical Coherence Tomography Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Optical coherence tomography; Speckle noise; Speckle pattern; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Optics; Noise (video); Line (geometry); Computer science; Computer vision; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Image (mathematics); Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002093722,0.0003999591,0.0004092013,0.000577374,0.0000554363,0.0004130511,0.0003211988,0.0003176706,0.00004067504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000722753,0.0004135186,0.000125758,0.0007969906,0.00009288271,0.00007222532,0.0006779867,0.001433722,0.00003591663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005632334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004866493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007462321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002921853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980428,0.00002541088,0.0004986685,0.0007346318,0.0002780968,0.0004203475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988622,0.0004280909,0.00003010746,0.0003576886,0.00007762052,0.0002442621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002492262,0.0002603523,0.006208728,0.001734034,0.0001682682,0.00002628103,0.0009625772,0.931529,0.001662747,0.008375268,0.002723183,0.04632465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003687663,0.00008861392,0.01063881,0.001037878,0.0001402604,0.00005910001,0.000544262,0.9238086,0.01092317,0.05069301,0.00009259786,0.001604952],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4318263,0.001789793,0.4043633,0.0005599324,0.0006778185,0.001856527,0.0001027014,0.001521593,0.157302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8369222,0.00001156705,0.1624611,0.00004975168,0.00009928935,0.0003308824,0.00003254039,0.00005234533,0.00004031452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.405096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01601058921805065,"score_gpt":0.2598105858104822,"score_spread":0.2437999965924315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}