{"id":"W4398222317","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1178525","title":"Public discourse and wilful incommensurability: a case for attentive free speech","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Sociology","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University; Association for Bahá’í Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Public discourse; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Social science; Political science; Politics; Philosophy; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005018309,0.0001451804,0.0002810704,0.0001929628,0.00009827608,0.00002594247,0.0001384279,0.0002751552,0.0001499448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008470481,0.0001320741,0.00009192368,0.0001212932,0.0009376425,0.00009812501,0.0000901094,0.0002992192,0.00001335796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001015359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003726003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000124736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001254426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986538,0.0002062722,0.000238276,0.0004719222,0.00004085108,0.0003888749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993332,0.0001851194,0.00003384519,0.0003342211,0.00003794893,0.0000756877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008239958,0.0003235507,0.422763,0.00007825614,0.0002352688,0.002489751,0.01866557,1.822321e-7,0.00003998301,0.06205458,0.3612309,0.1320365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007337838,0.001637678,0.1621753,0.000105231,0.0005285238,0.004962106,0.1832554,0.0006712226,0.00001926992,0.4710144,0.1668433,0.001449767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736711,0.003186652,0.00645292,0.01036836,0.00439959,0.0005251709,0.0002556552,0.00007794107,0.00106264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905307,0.00002162303,0.007125118,0.0002575284,0.0001603996,0.0002867902,0.00004453043,0.00002604784,0.001547283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4089598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5385824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0766635333328871,"score_gpt":0.3743032436236469,"score_spread":0.2976397102907598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}