{"id":"W4398843421","doi":"10.7910/dvn/u7w8vs","title":"Executive Agreements Database, Statement Regarding Amending The June 23, 1995 Memorandum of Understanding concerning counter terrorism Research and Development Between The Department Of Defense of the United States of America and The Department of the Solicitor General Of Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Nuclear Issues and Defense","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memorandum; Memorandum of understanding; Political science; Terrorism; Statement (logic); Executive branch; Executive summary; Law; Library science; Public administration; Business; Legislature; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002757663,0.0002748853,0.0007016603,0.0001214224,0.0008061,0.00003870385,0.001058692,0.00008012349,0.0001003582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002603727,0.000131867,0.00009440205,0.0005302303,0.003250783,0.0001057196,0.001323823,0.000350483,0.000001469551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005718473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001044771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3171056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1354665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950592,0.001158664,0.001060623,0.0003286837,0.001929169,0.0004636646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959316,0.001054183,0.001651089,0.0009482251,0.0003297236,0.00008517825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008002709,0.0001509701,0.001890047,0.0006127933,0.001693617,0.00000691442,0.03296966,0.0003063724,0.0001289993,0.001405515,0.9599575,0.00007733752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001470111,0.0000854877,0.0003370772,0.0007089842,0.0003032044,9.144001e-7,0.07315954,0.00002551472,0.001513102,0.0001226404,0.9221296,0.0001438335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2005306,0.00007759396,0.0000548119,0.0003363286,0.0004249613,0.002443131,0.79598,0.00000384559,0.0001486748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8633979,0.003597232,0.0003220435,0.0001997834,0.0001288901,0.00006244868,0.1320744,0.00004567378,0.0001716457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6639057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07482557431192,"score_gpt":0.3202483511722385,"score_spread":0.2454227768603185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}