{"id":"W4399130567","doi":"10.5964/ejop.13227","title":"An ecological approach to conceptual thinking in material engagement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Europe’s Journal of Psychology","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte; European Commission","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Conceptual framework; Cognition; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Mainstream; Perspective (graphical); Divergent thinking; Conceptual blending; Embodied cognition; Cognitive science; Psychology; Sociology; Affordance; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Aesthetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005261383,0.0008468396,0.0004109925,0.003350541,0.00341576,0.008601813,0.002578405,0.00235722,0.004057921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005653139,0.0005526387,0.001140965,0.001525717,0.04628824,0.01211543,0.007079823,0.003275521,0.0004738699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004590346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00304535,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003527491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003072227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956754,0.00241086,0.0001627504,0.0005718071,0.0008520974,0.0003270502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966826,0.001954487,0.0002736406,0.0004453146,0.000347924,0.0002961203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000503149,0.00001323483,0.000249892,0.00003305974,0.000003400525,0.00005741966,0.006689498,0.0003285758,0.0002999282,0.9895923,0.00008635658,0.002641254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007835235,0.00001336862,0.0004442934,0.00003448934,0.000005793727,0.0001389477,0.003305645,0.001361399,0.0002644956,0.9817121,0.01270051,0.00001115365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05264124,0.001895785,0.6458136,0.00943391,0.0002050391,0.0002307316,0.0000756699,0.0003264748,0.2893775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8398647,0.0008409068,0.1488974,0.0005556046,0.0001215144,0.0003831935,0.00006395278,0.0001261414,0.009146532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008601813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03330547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1063844006971016,"score_gpt":0.3736250331322943,"score_spread":0.2672406324351926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}