{"id":"W4399130567","doi":"10.5964/ejop.13227","title":"An ecological approach to conceptual thinking in material engagement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Europe’s Journal of Psychology","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte; European Commission","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Conceptual framework; Cognition; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Mainstream; Perspective (graphical); Divergent thinking; Conceptual blending; Embodied cognition; Cognitive science; Psychology; Sociology; Affordance; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Aesthetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00100135,0.0001103939,0.0001796506,0.0002647819,0.00006722869,0.0001027944,0.0003950408,0.00006352285,0.0002389452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002323365,0.00008477901,0.00004664931,0.0002952715,0.00009519415,0.0002130513,0.0000525255,0.000511769,0.0001474952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002647721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003085687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.003463e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.408957e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980165,0.0007994849,0.000403784,0.0003158027,0.000210967,0.0002534159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995584,0.0000938267,0.00007737504,0.0001211378,0.00003864523,0.0001105754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007289648,0.002599371,0.0001350195,0.00003198159,0.00002101395,0.004455856,0.00905419,0.0005988749,0.4274344,0.5246291,0.01110475,0.01920641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008945607,0.02394182,0.03472087,0.0006807931,0.0001891331,0.01714693,0.003754258,0.00174043,0.07812117,0.3920842,0.4362995,0.002375223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7846921,0.00006398423,0.002596817,0.001567632,0.004473199,0.0001744048,0.000008943953,0.00006783201,0.2063551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931583,0.00005140052,0.001643407,0.004465372,0.0006170221,0.000003555905,0.000001342292,0.00001669115,0.00004294698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4251948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3457187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1063844006971016,"score_gpt":0.3736250331322943,"score_spread":0.2672406324351926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}