{"id":"W4399202145","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0304756","title":"Mapping climate adaptation corridors for biodiversity—A regional-scale case study in Central America","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bobolink Foundation; International Conservation Fund of Canada; BAND foundation; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Adaptation (eye); Geography; Scale (ratio); Environmental resource management; Climate change adaptation; Climate change; Ecology; Regional science; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Biology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00154465,0.0004121071,0.0002687118,0.003624245,0.001352516,0.001451831,0.001125125,0.0006062629,0.0008460407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003895063,0.0002574823,0.000616138,0.006377146,0.0008272282,0.0009967653,0.001404525,0.0005387019,0.00006782656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002812915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001810539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2658258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4286915,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994147,0.0002039093,0.00003242087,0.0001361909,0.00006902806,0.0001438025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976348,0.0007856603,0.0005699289,0.0002012842,0.0004689218,0.0003394875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001832349,0.0002174172,0.9561483,0.0001587845,0.0002128191,0.003465171,0.009196392,0.004883731,0.001291269,0.000930032,0.001994036,0.02131894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002514276,0.00007432375,0.9654105,0.0001372508,0.0001323369,0.0009118037,0.01939424,0.009787825,0.0003020937,0.0004677669,0.003313279,0.00004343932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99844,0.0002300913,0.00025098,0.00006748073,0.000002441457,0.000033144,0.0003670794,0.00001123351,0.0005974427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974764,0.0001898145,0.00158415,0.00002811531,0.000004450245,0.00004733452,0.000489313,0.000007271747,0.0001732865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2658258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5285571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1112527408314016,"score_gpt":0.2520680783921553,"score_spread":0.1408153375607537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}