{"id":"W4399479149","doi":"10.22541/essoar.171805223.31837756/v1","title":"The impact of uncertainty in black carbon's refractive index on simulated optical depth and radiative forcing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Atmospheric Ozone and Climate","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Radiative forcing; Carbon black; Environmental science; Refractive index; Forcing (mathematics); Index (typography); Carbon fibers; Radiative transfer; Aerosol; Optical depth; Atmospheric sciences; Meteorology; Materials science; Optics; Computer science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001375002,0.001107352,0.0004503034,0.000475636,0.0005520131,0.001158629,0.0009032979,0.001844718,0.002492306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004141214,0.0004257226,0.001299393,0.0006117325,0.0006973505,0.001337713,0.0007957708,0.001391174,0.0003066682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001063594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001069611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05532109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02619767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999276,0.000228229,0.00003733422,0.0001781089,0.0001044278,0.0001758907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997269,0.001772458,0.0001870459,0.0002624888,0.0003154429,0.0001936118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005761913,0.0002668779,0.02952973,0.0001154293,0.0003820553,0.0001847474,0.00004135136,0.9534503,0.006786937,0.001451485,0.002359658,0.004855318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004387398,0.0004341034,0.07493556,0.0001296326,0.0003583685,0.0001001266,0.0002899046,0.8907029,0.02466094,0.002309332,0.005461505,0.0001787737],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777558,0.0005255819,0.003352088,0.001471085,0.0002401177,0.0000330769,0.006259787,0.0004014146,0.009961035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996182,0.00009281691,0.001015277,0.0001843174,0.00001571751,0.00001669607,0.001823775,0.00008304286,0.0005863088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05532109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1099982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01448061598488152,"score_gpt":0.2775170242735127,"score_spread":0.2630364082886311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}