{"id":"W4399701297","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173884","title":"Soft plastic fishing lures as a potential source of chemical pollution - Chemical analyses, toxicological relevance, and anglers’ perspectives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Science of The Total Environment","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Saskatchewan; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie; Toronto Metropolitan University; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Commission; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Phthalate; Diethyl phthalate; Bioassay; Dimethyl phthalate; Toxicology; Fishing; Environmental chemistry; Leaching (pedology); Environmental science; Biology; Chemistry; Ecology; Organic chemistry; Soil water","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006617734,0.0007735467,0.0004397201,0.001022134,0.0003896527,0.001225501,0.0003270432,0.0008108063,0.001457414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003167064,0.0002024851,0.0004964733,0.0007153391,0.0004956061,0.0007044463,0.0004140603,0.0004099002,0.0003533003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004126513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004721351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002765421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007109029,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994204,0.0001339767,0.00003128763,0.0001138436,0.0002272444,0.00007321586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995697,0.00006917361,0.0001294462,0.00001676964,0.0001788968,0.00003607996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006308139,0.0002231463,0.3089221,0.003177285,0.0003871266,0.003149052,0.0008372399,0.001586573,0.5161964,0.001177062,0.001765746,0.1619473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002380213,0.003436816,0.6107845,0.0008535716,0.0009219131,0.007319459,0.008492864,0.004119824,0.2812273,0.002804841,0.07984637,0.0001687627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9218443,0.06365941,0.004829406,0.001970734,0.0001531609,0.00005101784,0.000563987,0.00003384816,0.006894069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9428362,0.04689769,0.003217807,0.0006394791,0.0001671439,0.00002249164,0.0004160361,0.00001346154,0.005789658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002765421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005498648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009335950360238049,"score_gpt":0.2883648938309552,"score_spread":0.2790289434707172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}