{"id":"W4399913122","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomm.2024.100419","title":"Nash equilibria in greenhouse gas offset credit markets","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of commodity markets","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Offset (computer science); Carbon offset; Monte Carlo method; Economics; Nash equilibrium; Homogeneous; Optimal control; Mathematical optimization; Microeconomics; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002781896,0.0002136455,0.0006801221,0.0007788041,0.00005381499,0.0002386863,0.0004770206,0.0001720234,0.001632988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000305515,0.0002386526,0.0003119248,0.0002991035,0.0000669319,0.0007720162,0.0001551093,0.0005647271,0.0004001369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003258163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005989753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007137793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001533516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997806,0.00006391283,0.001379473,0.0002657163,0.00006755064,0.0004173617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985446,0.0003962228,0.0005127991,0.0003303731,0.00003771132,0.0001783325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001988216,0.001227266,0.1379745,0.001233797,0.0007283834,0.001246536,0.003540651,0.0001254482,0.0001528714,0.08348792,0.7380432,0.03025121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001991298,0.0002457094,0.1140025,0.000496143,0.00003007041,0.0004906344,0.0001308252,0.03638924,0.00006515443,0.1472965,0.6981559,0.0007059949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577852,0.004891967,0.0001401445,0.004903712,0.002747725,0.0001169074,0.0004434978,0.000032427,0.0289384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946789,0.00318149,0.0002220607,0.000325159,0.00101165,0.000004543266,0.00001505639,0.00004624519,0.0005149257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06380857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06532144771304554,"score_gpt":0.2672956978993558,"score_spread":0.2019742501863103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}