{"id":"W4400213145","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14363","title":"Competition intensity is linked to the co‐occurrence status and height differences of plant species found growing together in an old‐field community","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Algoma University; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Competition (biology); Biology; Co-occurrence; Ecology; Intraspecific competition; Nutrient; Plant community; Old field; Limiting; Interspecific competition; Relative species abundance; Species richness; Abundance (ecology)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005334147,0.00006019747,0.0001807756,0.00005873918,0.0001306001,0.00001535296,0.0001342069,0.00005160486,0.0002587374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009108192,0.00003964291,0.00002484412,0.00008536404,0.0002132523,0.0001647402,0.00009999031,0.000355145,0.000007216396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005399554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001159801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000119987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01340398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993034,0.0001989571,0.0002372695,0.00006964363,0.00007312588,0.0001175973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991414,0.0006409764,0.00009303227,0.0000674319,0.00002094646,0.00003622801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005157548,0.00007123634,0.9886612,0.00001270307,0.00002392156,0.00001058733,0.008892367,0.0001063444,0.0006827667,0.0008949945,0.0003279418,0.0002644181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001122724,0.000507929,0.9927274,0.00002993216,0.00001209515,0.00002322143,0.002328032,0.0006256558,0.00006029953,0.003112322,0.0004170915,0.00004374577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967592,0.00006794423,0.00007991064,0.002413189,0.0003145947,0.00006332713,0.0000200297,0.000002671961,0.0002791692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988926,0.0001703408,0.0001026719,0.0007851719,0.00001942774,0.000001650346,0.000002272851,0.00000160672,0.00002427888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01328399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7479733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03199522220658942,"score_gpt":0.2785402985981875,"score_spread":0.2465450763915981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}