{"id":"W4400229430","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2024.2370813","title":"Negotiating censorial power and its legitimacy: a case study of the second face of state censorship","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Censorship; Negotiation; State (computer science); Face (sociological concept); Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Face-to-face; Sociology; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008231906,0.00009929234,0.0002892186,0.00004350916,0.0001254237,0.00007972342,0.0001702513,0.0000623984,0.0002159221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004489866,0.00006192242,0.0001422017,0.00009780929,0.0002171424,0.0003130287,0.00006199985,0.0003419588,0.00000215471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001352565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002767388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001646299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004852173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984773,0.0001751825,0.000565036,0.0001146221,0.0003556862,0.0003121749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988671,0.0003958953,0.0003025357,0.00009785801,0.0001559679,0.0001806466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002088411,0.0008617895,0.01549975,0.000228545,0.0005395936,0.001539566,0.3369797,0.0001256437,0.0007316605,0.6397449,0.003135325,0.0004047508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008360329,0.004393944,0.1274902,0.001035616,0.0004977589,0.003291139,0.7150921,0.0006858591,0.002231249,0.05692115,0.07869114,0.00130944],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926765,0.0003947412,0.000004072358,0.0009480298,0.001376681,0.000172256,0.00005265909,0.000004394281,0.00437068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984783,0.000009090714,0.000009626771,0.00007523582,0.0002692383,5.500164e-7,3.126074e-8,0.00001018348,0.001147737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5828237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2525123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01934452872366847,"score_gpt":0.3205344667903504,"score_spread":0.3011899380666819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}