{"id":"W4400333666","doi":"10.5565/rev/isogloss.384","title":"Investigating the effect of prosodic markedness on the interpretation of simple disjunction in Romanian","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Isogloss Open Journal of Romance Linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Universitatea din București; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Prosody; Markedness; Romanian; Linguistics; Psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Coda; Philosophy; Aesthetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002279274,0.0001643434,0.0003716325,0.0001449313,0.0001595712,0.0003281474,0.0006022346,0.00004439704,0.00007165725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105444,0.00009306033,0.0001077481,0.0001436722,0.000278355,0.0001107844,0.0000899081,0.0003720737,0.000005449798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007539553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001106285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004397577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004807025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980642,0.0003091295,0.0009259523,0.0001459681,0.0004024048,0.0001523906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966085,0.001769656,0.0008465167,0.0002418989,0.0005018068,0.00003159999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000503683,0.000137898,0.01263955,0.001181596,0.0003036422,0.00004480281,0.09386608,0.00361793,0.0003008862,0.878973,0.0008652233,0.007565677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003198273,0.007016588,0.02086932,0.02125512,0.001269238,0.00006420816,0.02147211,0.2531406,0.00936319,0.6492562,0.0121276,0.0009675644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775114,0.0002702203,0.0008629487,0.003190456,0.007034989,0.0008228121,0.00003652463,0.00001629926,0.01025433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982367,0.00001123123,0.0002072896,0.00005275007,0.001368465,0.00001059598,0.000004731442,0.00002459571,0.00008363328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2495226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02299214008112656,"score_gpt":0.2826082630618655,"score_spread":0.2596161229807389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}