{"id":"W4400352299","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqae023.1429","title":"P-606 THE USABILITY OF A MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING TRAINING TOOLKIT IN WORK REHABILITATION","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Occupational Medicine","topic":"Occupational Therapy Practice and Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Motivational interviewing; Rehabilitation; Work (physics); Training (meteorology); Human–computer interaction; Applied psychology; Interview; Computer science; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Physical therapy; Engineering; Nursing; Psychological intervention; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005636567,0.0001096301,0.0002239521,0.000279085,0.0002200798,0.000006773167,0.0001766222,0.00009819152,0.002498056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00628571,0.00006564151,0.00006046698,0.001124566,0.0002280381,0.0002821157,0.00004956951,0.0007147831,0.00006680591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002122963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006408519,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002549784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001091479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996987,0.0009327816,0.0008532474,0.0002513778,0.0007359164,0.000239676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823177,0.01696528,0.0001405952,0.0002072365,0.0003212035,0.00004794707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007796925,0.0001288951,0.8088825,0.0007592565,0.0000748996,0.000003865846,0.04574619,0.0002301219,0.0005174746,0.08222254,0.01248389,0.04817061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005643753,0.0001459476,0.9566594,0.002021659,0.00001206276,0.000001030919,0.007199971,0.001030813,0.000003473738,0.01438953,0.01790194,0.00006977074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9301257,0.001257265,0.002946138,0.05621863,0.001129731,0.001028526,0.0000247628,0.00005385633,0.007215384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965979,0.00004024543,0.001071652,0.0006971713,0.0006670774,0.0002016813,0.00008067625,0.00001372557,0.0006298069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1477769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2584823436945232,"score_gpt":0.536739717287217,"score_spread":0.2782573735926938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}