{"id":"W4400352410","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.03.24309725","title":"Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Optimal Medical Therapy on Quality of Life and Functional Capacity Assessment in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"Cardiac Health and Mental Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Conventional PCI; Angina; Meta-analysis; Quality of life (healthcare); Acute coronary syndrome; Randomized controlled trial; Internal medicine; Physical therapy; Myocardial infarction; Random effects model; Revascularization; Canadian Cardiovascular Society; Cardiology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02242715,0.003318551,0.02562844,0.0049902,0.0006131685,0.003953431,0.0024911,0.002786047,0.004509258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03997622,0.001432663,0.05410334,0.005559457,0.0009482811,0.002090619,0.001537208,0.002860269,0.0002783307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002522144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002063234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004796579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005934669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9812201,0.01190698,0.003490988,0.001761159,0.001185723,0.000435007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721592,0.02220067,0.003517797,0.0008187786,0.0009625091,0.0003410488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00818373,0.00004336868,0.001920408,0.0944118,0.8896268,0.0000575046,0.0000271028,0.0007013901,0.00008671904,0.000111235,0.0002538848,0.004576066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003181155,0.0002968556,0.001665432,0.005141001,0.9886112,0.00003087188,0.00001631965,0.0003249491,0.00005488105,0.00024291,0.0004188954,0.00001549274],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01548255,0.980057,0.001702841,0.0002934175,0.0004018715,0.0008233944,0.0007204844,0.00006649939,0.0004518497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5046232,0.4790463,0.006502964,0.001693376,0.0007667016,0.004893712,0.00167592,0.00008593946,0.0007119338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02562844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1186076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1813344987842797,"score_gpt":0.4445882328038144,"score_spread":0.2632537340195348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}