{"id":"W4400381666","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2024.132342","title":"Low-carbon optimal scheduling of park-integrated energy system based on bidirectional Stackelberg-Nash game theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy","topic":"Integrated Energy Systems Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"China Postdoctoral Science Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Game theory; Nash equilibrium; Scheduling (production processes); Mathematical optimization; Best response; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003241793,0.000402778,0.0003943333,0.0006071667,0.00004466378,0.00007889442,0.0002028855,0.0003046413,0.00008718222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004022022,0.0003705938,0.0001519585,0.0008874853,0.00005068179,0.0001241245,0.00001810354,0.0002390594,0.00001234686],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000485717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001489693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004498781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000067212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980116,0.0002066263,0.0005782552,0.0004144801,0.0004023496,0.0003866668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990416,0.000233209,0.00007004387,0.0003739545,0.0001724995,0.0001087338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005690717,0.00003202863,0.00000279439,0.0001844817,0.0001625688,0.0000302645,0.00004568963,0.8845578,0.006552979,0.1058201,0.000194608,0.002359788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002172302,0.00007441678,0.000003409647,0.00105644,0.0000333225,0.00001210167,0.0001053049,0.8791112,0.1122015,0.00004391223,0.006830784,0.0003102954],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04404119,0.002303114,0.8644459,0.00002630961,0.005524431,0.0001105659,0.00008032027,0.003299872,0.08016828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960101,0.000055162,0.001574923,0.00002761715,0.0003688862,0.00008453502,0.0002026305,0.0001705516,0.001505575],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003915618844278697,"score_gpt":0.1798387762279705,"score_spread":0.1759231573836918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}