{"id":"W4400381666","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2024.132342","title":"Low-carbon optimal scheduling of park-integrated energy system based on bidirectional Stackelberg-Nash game theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy","topic":"Integrated Energy Systems Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"China Postdoctoral Science Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Game theory; Nash equilibrium; Scheduling (production processes); Mathematical optimization; Best response; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005895939,0.000726687,0.001240317,0.000405407,0.0006489163,0.001415777,0.001025185,0.0006544517,0.003231635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001060141,0.0003888278,0.0004811126,0.0005248882,0.0005026535,0.00115061,0.0006407321,0.000619345,0.0001904438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001309779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002245511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01081849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01265511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999626,0.0001130277,0.00001146574,0.00006552631,0.00007593273,0.0001080181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996512,0.0001518979,0.00004449801,0.00001204404,0.00008952938,0.00005087947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009394789,0.0000374992,0.0003143931,0.00004056188,0.00002260556,0.00004127722,0.00002202146,0.9824488,0.0009375873,0.01031921,0.0004930375,0.005229103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007949408,0.00001960789,0.0000721883,0.000001526589,0.000006026898,0.000004288339,0.00001067823,0.9967518,0.0001339412,0.002887159,0.0001019487,0.000002972276],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1524867,0.000333105,0.8261966,0.0003965652,0.0001047486,0.000148593,0.0001820507,0.0001938098,0.01995795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847985,0.00009950432,0.01301336,0.00002449838,0.00001094044,0.00005009063,0.00004890435,0.00001567893,0.001938601],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01081849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02151102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003915618844278697,"score_gpt":0.1798387762279705,"score_spread":0.1759231573836918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}