{"id":"W4400438922","doi":"10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116344","title":"A practical approach to estimate analytical method variability from routine testing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis","topic":"Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Gilead Sciences (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Identification (biology); Reliability engineering; Quality by Design; Calibration; Quality (philosophy); Biochemical engineering; Test method; Evaluation methods; Data mining; Chemistry; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03243412,0.002836697,0.001964072,0.005992048,0.001604647,0.004117398,0.004642789,0.003092673,0.003557729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06920416,0.001256943,0.002754756,0.004132486,0.00178956,0.002663991,0.003850556,0.004306763,0.002837365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001883254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004889654,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003714218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005389545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9543526,0.01194986,0.003046264,0.005842745,0.02432768,0.0004809306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661484,0.01416482,0.003389589,0.005803851,0.01027471,0.0002186097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004748653,0.0007934399,0.02211512,0.003008439,0.001121344,0.0006046714,0.001343105,0.02884162,0.1224196,0.02497596,0.009825471,0.7844763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000278894,0.005664842,0.04767159,0.002087289,0.001654603,0.006042555,0.001148184,0.347307,0.2905509,0.0794898,0.2171307,0.0009736001],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004797066,0.001185871,0.9883817,0.0002671599,0.0001985729,0.0008413855,0.000438203,0.001131091,0.00275892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05676249,0.00124797,0.935097,0.0004515612,0.000111725,0.002522439,0.0009208374,0.0003240053,0.002561983],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03243412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1715301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08320696238308621,"score_gpt":0.4164409277881648,"score_spread":0.3332339654050786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}