{"id":"W4400768236","doi":"10.1016/j.animal.2024.101266","title":"What the hay: predicting equine voluntary forage intake using a meta-analysis approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"animal","topic":"Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Forage; Hay; Nutrient; Animal science; Breed; Animal feed; Random effects model; Biology; Mathematics; Biotechnology; Agronomy; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Ecology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02476571,0.003021474,0.01219235,0.007025647,0.0006220722,0.004763754,0.002421353,0.002504184,0.003699392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05142642,0.001555036,0.05140751,0.004924052,0.0005622304,0.003014796,0.001627943,0.002397477,0.0005294863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001149618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002600099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006458262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01085207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9860623,0.009449862,0.002101233,0.001485695,0.0006463218,0.00025456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788337,0.01731305,0.001434313,0.00121305,0.00094598,0.0002598951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001798454,0.00003783867,0.01005183,0.07106569,0.8888823,0.0001378783,0.0001222713,0.002560298,0.0004861231,0.0004673522,0.001137199,0.02325276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008429827,0.0002532763,0.004146662,0.009653753,0.9765356,0.00008867356,0.00006024258,0.003064628,0.0002201887,0.002012286,0.003073783,0.00004797148],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02371676,0.943819,0.0223776,0.002975582,0.001104099,0.0008545091,0.003755581,0.0003902606,0.001006562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6574247,0.2774085,0.05070012,0.003700083,0.001353515,0.003316937,0.003668371,0.0004342642,0.001993523],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1309752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2641097232700454,"score_gpt":0.3572370505243382,"score_spread":0.09312732725429279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}