{"id":"W4400892206","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109277","title":"Critical reviews of exposure assessment in carcinogenic hazard identification: the IARC<i>Monographs</i>experience","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Occupational Cancer Research Centre; Veterans Affairs Canada","funders":"National Cancer Institute; European Commission; Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion; Government of Canada; World Health Organization","keywords":"International agency; Exposure assessment; Risk assessment; Identification (biology); Hazard; Hazard analysis; Medicine; Cancer; Environmental health; Computer science; Engineering; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1608694,0.002195123,0.003844218,0.0206329,0.001904796,0.01122939,0.005915851,0.006008742,0.005339134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3375391,0.001524208,0.00465513,0.01479861,0.00434954,0.008102953,0.005430381,0.006759883,0.002968507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01597187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0422059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007375189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01161368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8473145,0.07184831,0.03737084,0.005372858,0.03618588,0.00190763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.499344,0.2665639,0.04571559,0.01810272,0.166586,0.003687893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002636769,0.00009372619,0.000665327,0.1861754,0.0008044248,0.0002164942,0.004416106,0.0008546723,0.001334202,0.01684809,0.3273935,0.4609344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004087158,0.000114487,0.0008493137,0.2371216,0.0006665221,0.0002325353,0.0008728849,0.0001381571,0.0006971086,0.004426569,0.7547678,0.00007223676],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004344474,0.9363464,0.005601866,0.03708546,0.01136594,0.001414924,0.0004299686,0.0001479257,0.007173183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00790579,0.9240757,0.02662035,0.02652048,0.006904004,0.003452402,0.0008196323,0.0002068322,0.003494918],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8391306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8507688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03754419223122526,"score_gpt":0.3735679800178249,"score_spread":0.3360237877865996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}