{"id":"W4400901287","doi":"10.1177/14614529241258710","title":"Ecological constitutionalism within the Canadian context: Charter-ing international standards of the human right to a healthy environment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Law Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Seneca Polytechnic; University of Guelph-Humber","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Political science; Environmentalism; Environmental law; Environmental ethics; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Geography; Law; Environmental science; Democracy; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008635548,0.0004028555,0.0005494292,0.004853169,0.01602609,0.01699867,0.002389527,0.004304647,0.003084227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01534148,0.0003212809,0.0005077755,0.008625903,0.03028751,0.005045469,0.0034748,0.00771815,0.0001581556],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1457539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3706044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9898142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989562,0.00175926,0.0002139823,0.0007387909,0.005164766,0.002561192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899505,0.003602386,0.0005043583,0.0003933948,0.004279203,0.001270129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004774641,0.000008917839,0.0007548474,0.0000925475,0.000007017967,0.00008746175,0.003627885,0.0003492463,0.00007237756,0.9655411,0.01857971,0.01087418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001962879,0.00001426167,0.01405575,0.001345987,0.00006329668,0.0001029046,0.01573753,0.0009686775,0.0002985338,0.2245108,0.742758,0.0001246246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02883891,0.1030243,0.004340906,0.3622621,0.002023549,0.00007376497,0.0006136717,0.00006090688,0.498762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8420317,0.07789385,0.004520212,0.04750944,0.0008907248,0.00007777469,0.0003228938,0.00007520195,0.02667813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1457539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01936142629221647,"score_gpt":0.3195074073047585,"score_spread":0.300145981012542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}