{"id":"W4400959818","doi":"10.23952/jano.6.2024.3.08","title":"On fixed point iterative methods for solving non-Lipschitz quasi-monotone variational inequalities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied and Numerical Optimization","topic":"Optimization and Variational Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lipschitz continuity; Monotone polygon; Variational inequality; Fixed point; Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Inequality; Fixed-point theorem; Iterative method; Point (geometry); Mathematical analysis; Mathematical optimization; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009669354,0.000142625,0.0002859986,0.0003105756,0.0001504961,0.0003977932,0.000169741,0.00006743147,0.00005001055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001776394,0.0001119583,0.0001236375,0.0004533461,0.00001879207,0.0005493455,0.00004285856,0.0001460465,0.000002465666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005809623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001088217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001771265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.259708e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987722,0.00007211984,0.0005450306,0.0002323387,0.000246394,0.0001319064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981619,0.001096258,0.0002731272,0.00009471565,0.0002762619,0.00009774383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006630477,0.00007313697,0.000001394551,0.00001812915,0.00009403838,8.467253e-7,0.0009252942,0.5930985,0.0001905266,0.3960297,0.0002589919,0.00924307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004021553,0.000221104,0.00002839893,0.00003376429,0.00004269887,0.000008090369,0.00004438711,0.9662241,0.0002584227,0.0320918,0.0005160142,0.0001290138],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004079629,0.00007959352,0.9959558,0.002896155,0.0002829583,0.0001415758,0.000004824664,0.00003254532,0.0005657023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1230085,0.0000477531,0.87598,0.0006690182,0.000179806,0.00001696298,0.00001819755,0.00001158985,0.00006823869],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3731256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4565529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01511177582797063,"score_gpt":0.3083736395106421,"score_spread":0.2932618636826715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}