{"id":"W4400987438","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/8ya6h","title":"Denial and Misinformation in Defense of the Tar Sands: The Case of a Canadian Think Tank","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Misinformation; Denial; Skepticism; Politics; Viewpoints; Work (physics); Think tanks; Public relations; Consistency (knowledge bases); Public opinion; Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Psychology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01262902,0.0009540642,0.000552801,0.003255892,0.1081605,0.0176441,0.004239588,0.01453065,0.004920752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02544221,0.0009647006,0.0008861831,0.003554037,0.05733955,0.007034947,0.009672596,0.01391879,0.0005142224],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1540189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1282319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9486035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9486686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9809605,0.007686927,0.0003343013,0.001375526,0.004203279,0.005439509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9708124,0.01739635,0.001985081,0.0008908155,0.004369793,0.004545564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005638634,0.00003090854,0.002568035,0.00004287054,0.00001175771,0.004623906,0.926062,0.0002566655,0.0006206642,0.05566974,0.005967732,0.004089389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001720039,0.00001479584,0.001402541,0.0001265029,0.00002269144,0.0004015127,0.9147957,0.0006669267,0.0004153158,0.007651981,0.07440641,0.00007849407],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6907479,0.001589919,0.004491653,0.1499031,0.0005583504,0.0001430812,0.00009299868,0.0001256462,0.1523473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986166,0.0002967422,0.0007190051,0.004486697,0.00004576738,0.00001860024,0.00001566003,0.0000406577,0.00821094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1540189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9812181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2962626090155244,"score_gpt":0.4078924046424005,"score_spread":0.1116297956268761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}