{"id":"W4401036676","doi":"10.1177/13621688241262618","title":"‘Un futuro mejor para todos’: Towards a critical humanizing English language teaching","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Teaching Research","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Research Foundation for English Language Education","keywords":"Pedagogy; Curriculum; Critical pedagogy; Focus group; Injustice; Thematic analysis; Critical ethnography; Sociology; Ethnography; Cohesion (chemistry); Psychology; Politics; Unrest; Qualitative research; Social science; Social psychology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005974729,0.0005609398,0.0003528192,0.001272262,0.01157837,0.01002908,0.001278888,0.00184213,0.001428432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004451836,0.0003869075,0.0002421638,0.0005934745,0.02185344,0.004728977,0.0063756,0.003883104,0.0002382658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007079153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009073613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01223462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02415189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947526,0.004015686,0.00007167598,0.0002692145,0.0002789458,0.0006118929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968085,0.001401468,0.000405277,0.0001762058,0.0002748085,0.0009336669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002307201,0.0001371022,0.002876892,0.000211872,0.000002887238,0.0007999255,0.9454952,0.00003811586,0.001088587,0.02387588,0.002333239,0.02311731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007041265,0.00006291069,0.004448991,0.0004655309,0.000007281649,0.0005471149,0.8918419,0.0001120852,0.0008294625,0.004743404,0.09691712,0.00001709003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8215679,0.008917035,0.01060818,0.0375802,0.001026657,0.0003887488,0.00002908728,0.0001148638,0.1197672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884702,0.001583404,0.003567129,0.001138603,0.00007022798,0.0001004791,0.000008861225,0.00002413804,0.005036977],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01223462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05136311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1898516683071307,"score_gpt":0.5311284346715226,"score_spread":0.3412767663643919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}