{"id":"W4401045948","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4907749","title":"Stability and Reliability of Regional Cumulative Impact Mapping: A Canadian Pacific Case Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Geography; Stability (learning theory); Regional science; Environmental science; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009271048,0.0005335003,0.0005500629,0.004122441,0.002911134,0.002941303,0.00229723,0.000882471,0.001686011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06532492,0.0003068062,0.0005045908,0.01063159,0.002467693,0.001422757,0.001385675,0.0007700364,0.000173612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01801015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0168668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9663787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9670982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967611,0.0007578154,0.0001787777,0.0005869362,0.001256076,0.0004592086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9611407,0.02029671,0.002076452,0.002746889,0.01311833,0.0006209127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007454591,0.0001337963,0.6654412,0.0002642564,0.0004738939,0.001402791,0.008582788,0.1600386,0.00201586,0.01498091,0.006994464,0.138926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000733026,0.0001596642,0.7185946,0.0002078683,0.0006644147,0.0006964706,0.01471737,0.2376141,0.002633677,0.01079211,0.013656,0.0001905249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745368,0.0007272216,0.006829413,0.000644629,0.00001326966,0.00008649558,0.001824232,0.00009961336,0.01523825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995371,0.0001599388,0.003344276,0.00001179797,0.000003682674,0.00001368275,0.0004184266,0.00002227812,0.0006549165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03362125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1306734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02621882556709465,"score_gpt":0.3096071783626094,"score_spread":0.2833883527955148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}