{"id":"W4401055211","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102616","title":"Prospective Evaluation of Ease and Difficulties of 869 Cases of Intrauterine Devices Removals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; World Health Organization","keywords":"Medicine; Intrauterine device; Obstetrics; Prospective cohort study; MEDLINE; Gynecology; Medical physics; Family planning; Research methodology; Population; Surgery; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001259974,0.0004461046,0.0004390839,0.003947559,0.001323062,0.0008856985,0.0008841386,0.0009876065,0.003403919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01131884,0.000908807,0.0006314525,0.002358929,0.001010421,0.0009040178,0.001002445,0.0006993012,0.0008739642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007212785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008500447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008474863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0128395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979039,0.0004342997,0.0003994772,0.0003454893,0.0005842458,0.0003326104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834602,0.005541404,0.006957541,0.0008815292,0.001662147,0.001497023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001055108,0.00003510314,0.9980158,0.00001234281,0.00001301158,0.0005913602,0.000166215,0.00002685748,0.0001220376,0.00001423599,0.00004351774,0.0008540343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004217126,0.0001823452,0.9955207,0.00001061822,0.00001553962,0.003108505,0.0007021885,0.0000619424,0.00009644463,0.00001090782,0.0002755423,0.00001103123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983121,0.0002863715,0.00007278801,0.00001831227,0.000006641732,0.00002229044,0.0004145782,0.000004753286,0.0008622544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985549,0.0002877836,0.0001484402,0.00001984724,0.00001783908,0.00001727346,0.0005977653,0.000007571286,0.0003485925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008474863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01685107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02541915170531786,"score_gpt":0.3007736070595468,"score_spread":0.2753544553542289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}