{"id":"W4401242140","doi":"10.1177/00218863241269827","title":"Misrepresenting Methodology: A Critique of Epistemological Engineering in Social Science Research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Scientific misconduct; Philosophy of science; Misconduct; Rhetoric; Rigour; Scope (computer science); Empirical research; Engineering ethics; Social science; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3064577,0.001979286,0.003986473,0.01561532,0.02386154,0.0336905,0.01072147,0.02858816,0.001509295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3519886,0.001799224,0.003476276,0.01135872,0.2864792,0.03877364,0.01859869,0.0401529,0.0009499296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02522608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02959371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008025938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005105388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5528026,0.3570518,0.01411744,0.01471859,0.05717713,0.004132503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3745161,0.5644059,0.01299676,0.02160691,0.02406221,0.002412217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001078552,0.000009359685,0.0001303545,0.0001644652,0.0000186015,0.00007331457,0.02425761,0.0002280735,0.00004347134,0.9673558,0.003468156,0.004239995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000271913,0.00001395853,0.00007698213,0.0005340583,0.00001396364,0.00008972099,0.003406226,0.0006595,0.000163476,0.9571076,0.03787353,0.00003389755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008664706,0.0204143,0.1591159,0.7568927,0.00505712,0.0002021166,0.00005492732,0.0002002841,0.04939793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7033864,0.01429223,0.1045023,0.1537541,0.01462816,0.001829944,0.00005813425,0.000817601,0.006731275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9714118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8552611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2638101634218576,"score_gpt":0.5162792380013734,"score_spread":0.2524690745795158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}