{"id":"W4401247617","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109535","title":"Is precarious employment an occupational hazard? Evidence from Ontario, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Institute for Work & Health; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Occupational safety and health; Medicine; Relative risk; Occupational injury; Proportional hazards model; Hazard ratio; Occupational medicine; Demography; Injury prevention; Environmental health; Poison control; Confidence interval; Sociology; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003808785,0.0005630857,0.001185985,0.002164663,0.003015309,0.002247359,0.002496391,0.0008597398,0.00713282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01565343,0.0006658498,0.00158951,0.006196266,0.001951239,0.0006469761,0.00151311,0.001083784,0.0003253735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04305958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1227704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964371,0.0003908179,0.0003599866,0.0005244905,0.001619067,0.0006686125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792883,0.002881931,0.004551746,0.0007279284,0.01032607,0.002224156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007664122,0.00006658924,0.9309881,0.004363671,0.001046182,0.0003199546,0.003144661,0.000390868,0.0001505899,0.001378059,0.01146313,0.04592175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006056472,0.00004853595,0.9841818,0.003427491,0.000730293,0.00009043019,0.002090558,0.0002504456,0.00005173824,0.0001984777,0.008829853,0.00003966174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.615397,0.2852065,0.001436305,0.02171711,0.0007642169,0.0003644797,0.03276157,0.00009458154,0.0422582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341935,0.05796998,0.000534485,0.001279173,0.000122394,0.00005486405,0.003327597,0.00003348314,0.002484528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04305958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3124205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07064438805774433,"score_gpt":0.371189718144287,"score_spread":0.3005453300865427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}