{"id":"W4401283550","doi":"10.1080/23801883.2024.2385918","title":"‘ <i>Contra ius gentium</i> ’: The Mendoza-Drake Dispute and English Legal Arguments for Empire, 1580–1585","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Intellectual History","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Empire; Expansionism; Law; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Natural law; Political science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000585468,0.0002241089,0.0002304013,0.00005490202,0.0006337359,0.0002388277,0.0004025036,0.000147816,0.0003768591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006819671,0.0001875063,0.0001823215,0.0002493936,0.0007825008,0.0002798243,0.00008153535,0.0002164552,0.00007167524],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001413742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006590495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002072747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005333325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980904,0.0001722924,0.0002742133,0.0004875568,0.0004093892,0.0005660751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988234,0.0006091194,0.00004957908,0.0002112387,0.0001082895,0.0001983655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001337924,0.0000932124,0.00007471269,0.00005164944,0.0001972668,0.00003503105,0.1372995,0.000002498469,0.00003755145,0.04117272,0.8015762,0.01932585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002784549,0.0001228998,0.00009087131,0.00002754795,0.0001112948,0.000007086807,0.001506789,0.0001244114,0.00002413897,0.00115445,0.996331,0.0002210961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4317841,0.1208891,0.002117824,0.005900339,0.04856559,0.003239768,0.0007272986,0.001350346,0.3854256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854891,0.0009488223,0.0000802821,0.001105946,0.00134979,0.00008929186,0.00001469277,0.00002273265,0.01089939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5537049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7646285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0261389768028233,"score_gpt":0.2961711246272212,"score_spread":0.2700321478243979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}