{"id":"W4401283550","doi":"10.1080/23801883.2024.2385918","title":"‘ <i>Contra ius gentium</i> ’: The Mendoza-Drake Dispute and English Legal Arguments for Empire, 1580–1585","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Intellectual History","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Empire; Expansionism; Law; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Natural law; Political science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001455117,0.0001947253,0.0002002136,0.0006329727,0.004524459,0.00562869,0.0004507812,0.001852077,0.002163322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005188667,0.0001131016,0.0001174938,0.0005961586,0.01306419,0.002388134,0.001507219,0.002335767,0.0001431398],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01087175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002462865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08123154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09308704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993879,0.0002172475,0.00002007471,0.00009288509,0.0001022242,0.0001796924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991748,0.0004836307,0.0001174245,0.00005458581,0.0001100309,0.00005954157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004432469,0.00001029537,0.00122137,0.00003537477,0.000005224969,0.0004748833,0.04402287,0.0000894745,0.0003100325,0.939967,0.006176679,0.007642409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005441599,0.00002763613,0.01481301,0.0006102272,0.00002242943,0.0003781381,0.04668459,0.0002674161,0.00128159,0.1311954,0.8046184,0.00004679495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3740379,0.02409705,0.00106253,0.05902786,0.0006315866,0.00001525926,0.00005411182,0.00001263738,0.5410611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785769,0.001307042,0.0001808809,0.001775373,0.00008947739,0.000006508498,0.000008250677,0.00001070935,0.01804489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08123154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1615174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0261389768028233,"score_gpt":0.2961711246272212,"score_spread":0.2700321478243979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}