{"id":"W4401345632","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12321","title":"TRIPS and the right to human health: A case study on Brazil's health policies and its implications","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Right to health; TRIPS architecture; TRIPS Agreement; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Decree; Economic growth; Prerogative; Public health; Health care; Political science; Business; Politics; Law; Economics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003030603,0.0002315598,0.0003973169,0.000526837,0.001415062,0.0005400376,0.0003568163,0.00002307663,0.0002255686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005203785,0.00008350798,0.00008035595,0.0009156021,0.0001535286,0.0003599841,0.0002401696,0.0006229049,0.0001192034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007092032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009221536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002750797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002101528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982386,0.0002748333,0.0006841073,0.0002013095,0.0002698198,0.0003313528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985964,0.0006867626,0.0002279302,0.0002206011,0.0002085025,0.00005978716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002853175,0.0008502867,0.0001568877,0.0005756858,0.0006773524,0.0001596652,0.1348148,0.0001049322,0.0003999048,0.0119427,0.7845679,0.06289667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005633959,0.005571941,0.00189074,0.002348969,0.0005795271,0.00868814,0.03895864,0.006894105,0.0003324904,0.004766152,0.9231915,0.001143777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8116243,0.005034913,0.0001408868,0.1733122,0.0004399571,0.002037861,0.000004423192,0.00006599807,0.007339395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768926,0.0001812132,0.000004813382,0.01760856,0.0007101618,0.00001442483,7.279185e-7,0.0000304565,0.004557047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1652683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1661661703416547,"score_gpt":0.3331200826656997,"score_spread":0.166953912324045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}