{"id":"W4401400036","doi":"10.1002/2688-8319.12368","title":"Response to ‘Improving abundance estimation by combining capture–recapture and presence–absence data: Example with a large carnivore’","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Solutions and Evidence","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Victoria","funders":"Canadian Statistical Sciences Institute","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Carnivore; Abundance (ecology); Population; Population size; Statistics; Estimation; Population model; Geography; Ecology; Abundance estimation; Econometrics; Biology; Mathematics; Demography; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001293694,0.0001407088,0.0001365097,0.00002844131,0.0005998834,0.0001538747,0.0002333318,0.0001179993,0.0002115087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009424717,0.0001073417,0.00001165013,0.0003273941,0.0002896402,0.001002355,0.0005352958,0.0002314663,0.00006702349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008697748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003886303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006196445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001216517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984483,0.0001813305,0.0001689169,0.0006709717,0.0001689118,0.0003615664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984657,0.001052568,0.0000442262,0.0002777988,0.00001197424,0.0001477695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001030784,0.0004081454,0.8427925,0.0002005911,0.00006313786,0.0001901387,0.005588871,0.007393898,0.01068975,0.004307709,0.1049136,0.02242089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000175701,0.0003937152,0.8320894,0.000200226,0.00002967555,0.00006098273,0.0002681234,0.1529437,0.000008450655,0.0005027715,0.01306412,0.000263035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.958167,0.001590424,0.03092743,0.008664621,0.0001075941,0.0003404031,0.00002932103,0.000100076,0.00007314615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940732,0.00007671756,0.004283072,0.0009349243,0.00001583224,0.00007747023,0.00001394223,0.00000674123,0.0005181757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1455498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4613879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03618463606394759,"score_gpt":0.2651962071865113,"score_spread":0.2290115711225637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}