{"id":"W4401587560","doi":"10.1111/rec.14251","title":"Using a trait‐based dark diversity approach to evaluate natural recovery potential in forests","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Restoration Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Office of Energy Research and Development; Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Ecology; Understory; Restoration ecology; Context (archaeology); Plant community; Habitat; Forest restoration; Biodiversity; Species diversity; Community; Ecosystem; Species richness; Environmental resource management; Biology; Geography; Environmental science; Forest ecology; Canopy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001922627,0.0003426085,0.0003292239,0.002783951,0.0008473598,0.0008570881,0.0004434069,0.0002862375,0.0004824442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002708811,0.0001474193,0.0003406866,0.0009587923,0.001107708,0.000878124,0.001326819,0.0003130092,0.00007201153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009935778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005201368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01518294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0641509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993086,0.0002012672,0.00005293477,0.0001518994,0.0001972346,0.00008810005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976124,0.0006907757,0.0009894778,0.0001974212,0.0002933091,0.0002167367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001197419,0.00006358024,0.9580238,0.0000875606,0.0001644761,0.00005920094,0.000769248,0.004138897,0.01127688,0.0006204356,0.00007332698,0.0246028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002582736,0.00009978287,0.9898032,0.00001651126,0.00002622479,0.00007405686,0.0007739632,0.007111927,0.001042265,0.0007333503,0.0002980805,0.00001811679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865363,0.0001609357,0.01203691,0.00001998782,0.000001917959,0.00003492236,0.0001725695,0.0000218309,0.001014725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958188,0.00003169452,0.003890288,0.00001152524,0.00000211001,0.00002004853,0.0001104055,0.000003025787,0.0001121856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01518294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03018916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02789356380464819,"score_gpt":0.2783918424492822,"score_spread":0.250498278644634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}