{"id":"W4401835112","doi":"10.11124/jbies-24-00103","title":"The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for cohort studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JBI Evidence Synthesis","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical appraisal; Observational study; Systematic review; Clinical study design; Cohort study; Cohort; Grading (engineering); Research design; Medicine; Psychology; Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); MEDLINE; Clinical trial; Statistics; Engineering; Alternative medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2359975,0.0002630043,0.002798479,0.0001475764,0.0003968255,0.0006818686,0.001988519,0.00006609006,0.0004342479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7775667,0.00008548598,0.003026936,0.0008538777,0.0004528766,0.0002801872,0.0001582513,0.0001189825,0.00005735518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003659353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001850049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009363448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001427523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9805502,0.007606535,0.006802207,0.0008221795,0.003919574,0.0002992553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1337593,0.8569493,0.00264925,0.003711663,0.002861918,0.00006856434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001064872,0.0001455147,0.06964321,0.005348832,0.0101056,0.00000283671,0.00190974,0.0002545456,0.0005651925,0.1123905,0.3743771,0.4251505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002575065,0.000446169,0.1096129,0.007148872,0.03149594,0.00001431917,0.01741776,0.2512637,0.002521351,0.04919419,0.529753,0.0008742415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05785679,0.1412129,0.7386224,0.04305693,0.00499821,0.01264762,0.0006672789,0.0000388034,0.0008991642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761844,0.004208599,0.0162365,0.00004895864,0.0002160474,0.002169291,4.27399e-7,0.00001900484,0.0009168054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9183276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7867013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5736276608991764,"score_gpt":0.5954410393680415,"score_spread":0.02181337846886511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}