{"id":"W4401952439","doi":"10.1007/s13385-024-00395-3","title":"Claim reserving via inverse probability weighting: a micro-level Chain-Ladder method","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Actuarial Journal","topic":"Probability and Risk Models","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Weighting; Inverse; Chain (unit); Inverse probability weighting; Mathematical finance; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Econometrics; Economics; Financial economics; Physics; Propensity score matching","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03519885,0.0003792357,0.0005250257,0.0005276378,0.0008678509,0.002504765,0.00219873,0.0001427919,0.001715437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006314699,0.0002484404,0.0005753171,0.00106637,0.0002349089,0.001237752,0.000867634,0.00174478,0.002169667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002606205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004875064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003691688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006596414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892539,0.005238056,0.001751312,0.001113389,0.001902827,0.0007404586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952525,0.002138306,0.000410869,0.001087729,0.0005589392,0.0005516193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009141977,0.0005922025,0.00109939,0.0001148244,0.0004444112,0.002432215,0.02252945,0.003560408,0.04839415,0.00908948,0.1689763,0.741853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001407511,0.0002934141,0.002479971,0.0002901935,0.0001118314,0.002099414,0.0006091134,0.04617935,0.001832126,0.5864461,0.3573961,0.0008548526],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1360708,0.0007071458,0.8113529,0.0100071,0.007561643,0.0005558687,0.00004536692,0.000310716,0.03338845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7033482,0.0001195513,0.2769603,0.001735728,0.008435743,0.000006840045,0.000007351352,0.0001732972,0.00921303],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7409981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2335762289406879,"score_gpt":0.3979109185888492,"score_spread":0.1643346896481613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}