{"id":"W4401997046","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12973","title":"Prospective evaluation of a new audit standard: Expert rhetoric and flexibility in cost‐benefit analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Université Laval","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Queen's University; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Audit; Rhetorical question; Rationality; Flexibility (engineering); Psychology; Rhetoric; Cognition; Legitimacy; Public relations; Actuarial science; Accounting; Business; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Management; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2273649,0.0005930493,0.000690003,0.004884956,0.005569273,0.01441568,0.001960916,0.004868288,0.003332775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3864042,0.0006561108,0.0004920503,0.00187402,0.02296182,0.01373335,0.007674299,0.005750609,0.0003650018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009769201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008502668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002180024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002867014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6511224,0.3050078,0.008051894,0.005054889,0.02778715,0.002975942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2466923,0.695102,0.01728811,0.01563063,0.02303093,0.002255929],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053009,0.0001831996,0.01181131,0.0009512813,0.00009165866,0.001317754,0.4028053,0.003033905,0.004356576,0.4530585,0.00608841,0.115772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002103701,0.0005571364,0.01770292,0.005551664,0.000220255,0.001552009,0.2107048,0.02588536,0.009993976,0.5783204,0.1488284,0.0004727625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5615102,0.003391839,0.1891401,0.07196549,0.0008969757,0.0007132682,0.00009716886,0.000238262,0.1720466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866904,0.0001737883,0.01081428,0.001178524,0.0001196436,0.00006982783,0.000009886866,0.00002146472,0.0009222382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2273649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9527966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08188730434226427,"score_gpt":0.3688598950880586,"score_spread":0.2869725907457943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}