{"id":"W4402285950","doi":"10.1002/jrsm.1751","title":"Narrative reanalysis: A methodological framework for a new brand of reviews","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Synthesis Methods","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Systematic review; Scope (computer science); Identification (biology); Phenomenon; Computer science; Process (computing); Data extraction; Narrative inquiry; Selection (genetic algorithm); Data science; Management science; Epistemology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6630316,0.004780267,0.01049064,0.03541925,0.005869177,0.02744492,0.01318274,0.00782969,0.008954277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7564392,0.004215403,0.0110003,0.02921611,0.02200456,0.02404551,0.01843418,0.01708401,0.003387494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01307731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06061413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004355187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00572128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1991377,0.7076472,0.06225697,0.01101681,0.01886025,0.001081029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1299799,0.7218391,0.03619377,0.05673457,0.05326799,0.001984669],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005674677,0.0001075495,0.0008101586,0.06929257,0.003267699,0.0003730082,0.04058407,0.005202025,0.0007529929,0.5978323,0.03568359,0.2455265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005354247,0.0002790675,0.0003533546,0.05265785,0.001617307,0.00029609,0.006485921,0.00701951,0.001097751,0.6609756,0.2682329,0.0004491484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005648665,0.0201371,0.925064,0.02665717,0.006094474,0.01602603,0.001227516,0.000779753,0.003449083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006245424,0.007641679,0.9417754,0.002599924,0.001449666,0.03917493,0.0003195396,0.0002403536,0.0005531809],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3369684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.415542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9822347056140353,"score_gpt":0.7876605260465089,"score_spread":0.1945741795675263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}