{"id":"W4402512972","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0309954","title":"Romantic relationship configurations and their correlates among LGBTQ+ persons: A latent class analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cohabitation; Latent class model; Psychology; Romance; Sexual relationship; Class (philosophy); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Human sexuality; Sociology; Computer science; Geography; Gender studies","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001363301,0.0002300766,0.0002876839,0.001573278,0.001173148,0.00142228,0.0005279206,0.0002924769,0.003796461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00234594,0.0001448111,0.000600624,0.001541229,0.0006765011,0.0004134452,0.0009603438,0.0005831184,0.0002181717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002072937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001353801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1595132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2040928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993677,0.0002104597,0.00003779003,0.000082581,0.0001316498,0.0001699122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987086,0.000249643,0.0004215098,0.0001623534,0.0002512017,0.0002066928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004982449,0.00005314194,0.9956802,0.000005829354,0.00002463181,0.00001175069,0.0009711835,0.00005368305,0.00009058648,0.0000911097,0.0001092269,0.002858935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003153865,0.00003092226,0.9957794,0.000009480832,0.00001003646,0.00001962717,0.002762973,0.001134106,0.00002791005,0.00007122515,0.0001473916,0.000003670532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990776,0.00002633533,0.0002306593,0.00003185918,0.000001069781,0.00003104421,0.0002666123,0.000003258136,0.0003315212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991122,0.00002131822,0.0002562101,0.000005874229,0.000001315046,0.00004028516,0.0004189032,0.000001702835,0.000142254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1595132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3171695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1248083778220218,"score_gpt":0.2854765664216785,"score_spread":0.1606681885996567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}