{"id":"W4402610852","doi":"10.1111/2041-210x.14419","title":"Estimating effective population size using close‐kin mark–recapture","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Statistics; Population size; Population; Geography; Econometrics; Biology; Mathematics; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001660196,0.00009586752,0.0001318181,0.00006036437,0.0001606099,0.00001385804,0.00004526865,0.0002408503,0.0002118976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006300347,0.00009499241,0.00002449613,0.0002664469,0.0001072826,0.0002655418,0.00006794371,0.0002333618,0.0000289556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004017721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001012199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003855332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000588295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998518,0.0007656153,0.0001810112,0.0002996804,0.00004856229,0.0001871407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988924,0.0009571234,0.00004597696,0.00007520652,0.000003954645,0.00002530924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001934996,0.00001651443,0.9636614,0.00001796165,0.000007478448,0.000005396403,0.0001830861,0.00494293,0.001397145,0.0006395795,0.00007980358,0.02902935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009312166,0.00003067425,0.7167107,0.00001688578,0.00001658181,0.00002093825,0.00001924795,0.2494964,0.00002142272,0.0334455,0.00005832434,0.00007021109],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.930737,0.0001390742,0.06717322,0.0002710298,0.0009381014,0.0002343359,9.36766e-7,0.00004708461,0.0004592169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7396304,0.000002453367,0.2600758,0.0001228358,0.00005589014,0.00002977077,0.000002925238,0.000005779658,0.0000741949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2469507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3873678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01269680414572058,"score_gpt":0.3282238650980566,"score_spread":0.3155270609523361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}