{"id":"W4402667233","doi":"10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102880","title":"Accurate backside boundary recognition of girth weld beads","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing","topic":"Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Key Research and Development Program of China","keywords":"Girth (graph theory); Boundary (topology); Computer science; Materials science; Artificial intelligence; Pattern recognition (psychology); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003177214,0.0005624241,0.001005758,0.001307886,0.0004855653,0.001767097,0.00104506,0.001262873,0.003072129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001142669,0.0006083159,0.0004800997,0.0006021408,0.000431389,0.001104068,0.001228378,0.001008831,0.002231115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003305165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006152235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001521875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002012433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994649,0.00004775203,0.00002292002,0.0001204966,0.0002467253,0.00009717142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994728,0.00009440813,0.00006346288,0.0001419949,0.0001837426,0.00004357853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007192462,0.00007183989,0.002228344,0.0001655081,0.00003182927,0.0002057864,0.0002085154,0.02011207,0.571403,0.001897694,0.001520541,0.4014357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002447994,0.0001716075,0.008786356,0.00005257321,0.00003872164,0.0006245889,0.000166638,0.5683979,0.4152757,0.001847298,0.00455054,0.00006360122],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1781942,0.00058957,0.8128754,0.0000926615,0.0001049393,0.00005135651,0.0001346743,0.00355477,0.004402456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6978146,0.0003151859,0.2953807,0.00007707201,0.00002723198,0.00003731568,0.0004683161,0.0006233888,0.0052562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003072129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01027733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01334290764961176,"score_gpt":0.2186355413501728,"score_spread":0.205292633700561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}