{"id":"W4402755179","doi":"10.22037/ghfbb.v17i3.3005","title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of citation count as a measure of methodological quality in esophagogastric surgery research: a comparative analysis with the MINORS score and levels of evidence.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Measure (data warehouse); Quality (philosophy); Medicine; General surgery; Data mining; Computer science; Library science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3247557,0.002824811,0.01997968,0.07317079,0.002243001,0.01381196,0.005234482,0.005670285,0.005664765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7410477,0.001887072,0.03128465,0.06744689,0.004488374,0.01189188,0.008609986,0.002848344,0.0007128898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00787948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006857361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001658459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002678131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4657911,0.2428827,0.1789081,0.01565041,0.09527457,0.001493062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1338618,0.6925973,0.1226006,0.01603641,0.03229041,0.0026134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01083492,0.0003033175,0.2962761,0.2225867,0.2780613,0.0005159176,0.004919129,0.001993507,0.0007300446,0.00417878,0.005361235,0.1742391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008881421,0.009208656,0.4315501,0.09401089,0.3676832,0.00543088,0.007706707,0.01276713,0.001945985,0.03201988,0.02707958,0.001715548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1173654,0.814182,0.03525174,0.00565037,0.003223927,0.008509109,0.009196102,0.0003947802,0.006226502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.836137,0.0771279,0.06116244,0.001274502,0.002322165,0.01648369,0.004081232,0.0002937736,0.001117346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9268292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8326964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9942480381315729,"score_gpt":0.7369400811929159,"score_spread":0.257307956938657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}