{"id":"W4402772798","doi":"10.1038/s41393-024-01033-1","title":"The spinal cord injury (SCI) peer support evaluation tool: the development of a tool to assess outcomes of peer support programs within SCI community-based organizations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spinal Cord","topic":"Spinal Cord Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Spinal Cord Injury Alberta; University of Saskatchewan; Praxis Spinal Cord Institute; Spinal Cord Injury BC; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; International Collaboration On Repair Discoveries; University of British Columbia; Spinal Cord Injury Ontario; McGill University; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Government of Canada","keywords":"Peer support; Delphi method; Test (biology); Medicine; Peer review; Spinal cord injury; Peer group; Applied psychology; Social support; Face validity; Content validity; Medical education; Psychology; Nursing; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1132858,0.001271946,0.002192464,0.01090273,0.002721651,0.004093031,0.002432342,0.001098068,0.001921605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1613527,0.0009375125,0.003888558,0.007378076,0.001833636,0.004935664,0.006042084,0.00215806,0.0005329456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007247144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03813742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01008712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02513748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8914219,0.06223651,0.01953035,0.001809694,0.02316841,0.001833148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8743051,0.05035538,0.01715646,0.00442218,0.05011564,0.003645243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001076814,0.001992595,0.1467912,0.01540505,0.00116707,0.0002955007,0.01810756,0.002592657,0.001827659,0.003664674,0.02178125,0.7852979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002801619,0.009900238,0.7720284,0.0330725,0.002424615,0.001316851,0.03885107,0.02107849,0.01096436,0.01111397,0.0953927,0.001055068],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.513351,0.00711644,0.1693808,0.006671272,0.0009831871,0.2606383,0.01070738,0.002023135,0.02912841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3161929,0.002638895,0.5449546,0.0007163193,0.0000953116,0.129752,0.003413192,0.0001180178,0.002118778],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1132858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5991197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2250938216224126,"score_gpt":0.4865245919510314,"score_spread":0.2614307703286188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}