{"id":"W4402772798","doi":"10.1038/s41393-024-01033-1","title":"The spinal cord injury (SCI) peer support evaluation tool: the development of a tool to assess outcomes of peer support programs within SCI community-based organizations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spinal Cord","topic":"Spinal Cord Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Spinal Cord Injury Alberta; University of Saskatchewan; Praxis Spinal Cord Institute; Spinal Cord Injury BC; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; International Collaboration On Repair Discoveries; University of British Columbia; Spinal Cord Injury Ontario; McGill University; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Government of Canada","keywords":"Peer support; Delphi method; Test (biology); Medicine; Peer review; Spinal cord injury; Peer group; Applied psychology; Social support; Face validity; Content validity; Medical education; Psychology; Nursing; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01054358,0.000358597,0.0005522558,0.0003816609,0.0007077231,0.0002228965,0.0008882557,0.0001327586,0.0003931224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003288619,0.0002200425,0.0001775007,0.002374526,0.0004490268,0.0001875819,0.0003941238,0.00106243,0.0001447399],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004172843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00621995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001252365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003280794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932482,0.0004939234,0.001269366,0.0004100979,0.004004877,0.0005735963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925811,0.0001894745,0.0002663507,0.001176663,0.005598838,0.0001875612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.06312594,0.001936641,0.1577598,0.002822809,0.001331397,0.00008053389,0.002848255,0.00002613676,0.02692227,0.005601791,0.01945401,0.7180904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002580731,0.1131221,0.7035272,0.001819019,0.001285894,0.0001413422,0.008133226,0.001175061,0.04151345,0.0007844869,0.1248453,0.001072171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838786,0.00005511037,0.002242505,0.009234126,0.0006361338,0.002965081,0.00003937515,0.0001190062,0.0008300656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893886,0.000003222594,0.006081232,0.0005442577,0.00009406068,0.0004050752,0.0002723181,0.00007557152,0.003135669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7170182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2250938216224126,"score_gpt":0.4865245919510314,"score_spread":0.2614307703286188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}