{"id":"W4402773866","doi":"10.21511/ppm.22(3).2024.45","title":"Public management of scientists’ potential as a source of economic development: A bibliometric analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Problems and Perspectives in Management","topic":"Innovation Policy and R&D","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Scopus; Index (typography); Library science; Bibliometrics; Data science; Open access journal; Computer science; Regional science; Political science; World Wide Web; Sociology; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009245745,0.0004063371,0.001084132,0.1235643,0.001784321,0.006913192,0.0006733548,0.0005876956,0.002392965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04134337,0.0002305551,0.001267636,0.1952359,0.001077789,0.005296807,0.002675258,0.0005233553,0.0003772121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00348042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004384615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00834492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006759979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911997,0.002078115,0.00135247,0.0005480688,0.004360656,0.0004610299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658147,0.02079589,0.004666385,0.001732322,0.006371529,0.000619229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001746531,0.000187607,0.6753074,0.003942062,0.001437864,0.0005229458,0.00860413,0.004749992,0.001017631,0.02143521,0.01275085,0.2698696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003177324,0.0001222473,0.8811436,0.001343025,0.001103729,0.0006863808,0.01828915,0.01688148,0.001402172,0.01499677,0.06385655,0.0001431741],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9058022,0.01515976,0.009914179,0.00385778,0.0001315809,0.0005484573,0.01764381,0.0002614993,0.04668063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980285,0.006176453,0.005353961,0.0000535465,0.00009694326,0.0002296888,0.006743146,0.00003609157,0.00102505],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04889673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06816487234874527,"score_gpt":0.2684463060477741,"score_spread":0.2002814336990289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}