{"id":"W4403228773","doi":"10.1186/s12874-024-02349-5","title":"Do authors of systematic reviews of epidemiological observational studies assess the methodologies of the included primary studies? An empirical examination of methodological tool use in the literature","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Systematic review; Data extraction; Scopus; MEDLINE; Medicine; Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology; Descriptive statistics; Meta-analysis; Statistics; Pathology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8127444,0.002900465,0.01315857,0.04257279,0.004313899,0.02618293,0.009315635,0.009082534,0.003480243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9648657,0.007986185,0.01232899,0.05628607,0.01601018,0.03862454,0.01486456,0.007793799,0.001330903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02308505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0329924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004304952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004905482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.05449906,0.632217,0.2333556,0.01526795,0.06290336,0.001757006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.01287639,0.7844272,0.1250717,0.02744674,0.04947373,0.0007043072],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002531438,0.0001813248,0.08512305,0.4987447,0.05888019,0.0003513079,0.08017422,0.001853466,0.0007047942,0.02981362,0.0100146,0.2316273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002794703,0.001131666,0.04167699,0.7844532,0.03466656,0.001229773,0.0247509,0.004080098,0.001899086,0.05755826,0.04494645,0.0008122697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05042362,0.6958981,0.1543869,0.053532,0.007822266,0.02165272,0.004461751,0.0004851518,0.01133755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5399781,0.184535,0.1953068,0.01828681,0.002977664,0.05535632,0.002262914,0.000545695,0.0007508106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1872556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2309196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9969178312483066,"score_gpt":0.8001490210117719,"score_spread":0.1967688102365347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}