{"id":"W4403401924","doi":"10.7717/peerj.17967","title":"Effect of environmental DNA sampling resolution in detecting nearshore fish biodiversity compared to capture surveys","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Fishery; Biology; Ecology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"bench_or_experimental","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03774926,0.0004679613,0.0006346497,0.0008155583,0.0006224666,0.001513314,0.0008783131,0.001162255,0.00146616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08241243,0.0008179165,0.0006661955,0.00121686,0.0008340728,0.001472215,0.001623779,0.0007216086,0.0004603083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004886963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000396668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003187516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007581197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.955853,0.03058697,0.003803099,0.005366455,0.003506176,0.0008843082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8167171,0.1581545,0.009250425,0.008656421,0.005835959,0.001385525],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002513553,0.000198693,0.9208475,0.0003922784,0.0007216941,0.0003067525,0.0008154949,0.003022605,0.02096679,0.0004049955,0.0005280689,0.04928147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001287825,0.001782613,0.9660519,0.0000840642,0.0004034543,0.0009124652,0.0005887998,0.009580687,0.01736891,0.0003596875,0.002687048,0.00005147462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.951588,0.00193351,0.03954476,0.0005035165,0.0001490681,0.000298268,0.0008138586,0.0001914925,0.004977524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577128,0.0002883608,0.03955583,0.0007623585,0.00005839992,0.0002522144,0.0004766445,0.00004878236,0.0008446204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03774926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1996396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01764459207317428,"score_gpt":0.2346184603784394,"score_spread":0.2169738683052651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}