{"id":"W4403627862","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105927","title":"Flow field analysis of self-sustained flutter of a wide-slotted bridge deck","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","topic":"Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Western University","keywords":"Flutter; Bridge (graph theory); Structural engineering; Deck; Bridge deck; Flow (mathematics); Field (mathematics); Engineering; Geology; Aerodynamics; Mechanics; Aerospace engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001268354,0.0001666234,0.0002986168,0.0005432972,0.000248294,0.0002473588,0.000193663,0.0002511444,0.0004981773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001882969,0.00009163834,0.00019878,0.0001774924,0.0002711647,0.0002252535,0.0001255723,0.0001655549,0.00005338452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002007789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001635773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001375429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001516315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999461,0.000004764105,0.000003045618,0.00001680715,0.00001637615,0.00001290518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999162,0.00001938537,0.00001067065,0.000008193834,0.00002648781,0.00001898252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006438869,0.0003350664,0.07582311,0.0001311481,0.00006284511,0.001467671,0.0005700808,0.02921153,0.8413779,0.0004805973,0.0003591863,0.04953692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005704894,0.0009355498,0.5321595,0.00002025891,0.00003716045,0.0003905116,0.0007233,0.3852765,0.07934196,0.0002533089,0.0007331641,0.0000717143],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998668,0.00002429931,0.001065421,0.000007824206,0.000004723772,0.000004970831,0.00002863349,0.00001888502,0.0001772119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990515,0.00001275212,0.0007142592,0.00000381242,0.000002251622,0.000003061368,0.00005824531,0.000002299555,0.0001518207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001375429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00273484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008195072524924607,"score_gpt":0.2027080905190865,"score_spread":0.1945130179941619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}