{"id":"W4403671161","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.10.003","title":"The reporting of equity-relevant sociodemographics in the Canadian ophthalmology literature","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary; McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Optometry; Ophthalmology; Medicine; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02880595,0.0003470173,0.0006024078,0.02372983,0.004408328,0.007637152,0.00271731,0.001333691,0.005170929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1957763,0.0005174177,0.0006552438,0.03579134,0.00335329,0.002566785,0.003827813,0.001349233,0.0001900893],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02954298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1036213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9366356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9379522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9655241,0.005973964,0.006416133,0.002115405,0.01586505,0.00410532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7712952,0.08438385,0.04063427,0.007127482,0.08871353,0.00784568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002021781,0.00005903954,0.8100253,0.00847159,0.0006492384,0.0006805508,0.03600054,0.0002438069,0.0003227387,0.02378798,0.05443273,0.06512428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002317599,0.00002725818,0.8757395,0.01136942,0.0004698118,0.0005235643,0.04264356,0.0002069642,0.0003042662,0.001977937,0.06663591,0.0000785379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5121191,0.2126825,0.00109632,0.08298039,0.002688805,0.0004667855,0.04712818,0.00005369116,0.1407843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571711,0.03111192,0.0005379734,0.005606862,0.0004922388,0.00007939495,0.004119692,0.00002099043,0.000859773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.971194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2143503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07728804636781374,"score_gpt":0.4024858741187553,"score_spread":0.3251978277509416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}