{"id":"W4403825072","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.760","title":"Monitoring inequities using routine administrative data: a case study of cancer screening in Ontario, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Public Health","topic":"Global Cancer Incidence and Screening","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002426697,0.0004689892,0.0005792378,0.002316391,0.005470408,0.001689456,0.002084673,0.0007896982,0.001364726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008146873,0.0004904364,0.0007006784,0.008871892,0.001333893,0.0005845496,0.001572262,0.001041472,0.0001366328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06667072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06379589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99663,0.0006210081,0.0001851169,0.0003376382,0.000988274,0.001237951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911952,0.001289855,0.001730901,0.0005440272,0.004016517,0.001223473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007980747,0.0001327593,0.9882296,0.00006771938,0.00008727409,0.0006193764,0.003645322,0.0003965684,0.0001449139,0.0002962449,0.001378327,0.004922163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002077906,0.00005652797,0.988214,0.00006722016,0.00005706235,0.0002010415,0.00769033,0.002228044,0.00008446517,0.00009078787,0.001263129,0.00002657089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948985,0.0003248629,0.0002112305,0.0005003295,0.000005638848,0.000141217,0.002414525,0.000008674559,0.001494988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978746,0.0002148165,0.0004895399,0.0001007477,0.000004416778,0.00004300934,0.000829833,0.000004909003,0.0004381725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06667072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4837322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5900246594734021,"score_gpt":0.4808910321421389,"score_spread":0.1091336273312632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}