{"id":"W4403899198","doi":"10.1177/01632787241286911","title":"Who’s at the Table? A Scoping Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Medical Education Program Evaluation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Viewpoints; Stakeholder engagement; Medical education; Accountability; Inclusion (mineral); Public relations; Stakeholder analysis; Psychology; Program evaluation; Best practice; Medicine; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06319022,0.0004313093,0.001578822,0.0005405435,0.0006353418,0.00002652581,0.0004706325,0.0004124276,0.005028051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01849705,0.0002200564,0.0002570934,0.003752264,0.0002385621,0.0001006006,0.000279177,0.002359626,0.0001617453],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003485868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08184129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005184495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000149866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9811012,0.008946712,0.00357556,0.0007135327,0.005125375,0.0005376547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940132,0.0006825577,0.001837275,0.001432406,0.001867811,0.0001667496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000381365,0.0003600298,0.000003383683,0.2083302,0.0000493371,2.028132e-7,0.0007459942,5.857343e-7,1.637354e-8,0.0002145003,0.1044768,0.6858152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002682801,0.00008029553,0.00003450799,0.5800622,0.001738967,0.00002154766,0.0004067783,0.0009525766,7.279672e-8,0.0001060967,0.4162198,0.0001089712],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001787619,0.8571329,0.00002121427,0.07533801,0.002663739,0.06382394,0.00001039238,0.00005514246,0.0009368135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00001157921,0.9217716,0.0003376267,0.00888831,0.0005259464,0.06499094,0.002110772,0.0000699954,0.00129319],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6857062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4900200572623418,"score_gpt":0.6423792961658585,"score_spread":0.1523592389035167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}