{"id":"W4403945617","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000524","title":"A worldwide test of the predictive validity of ideal partner preference matching.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; University of California, Davis; National Institutes of Health; Sabancı Üniversitesi; Universidade Federal de Sergipe; Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja; Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu; National Research University Higher School of Economics; Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV; Anglia Ruskin University; Université de Paris; National Science Foundation; University of Queensland; Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie; John Templeton Foundation; Australian Research Council; Teesside University","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Test (biology); Predictive validity; Preference; Matching (statistics); Ideal (ethics); Test validity; Developmental psychology; Psychometrics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02862798,0.0008881337,0.0009128459,0.002822295,0.001022529,0.001260422,0.001194234,0.001107685,0.01285415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09849669,0.0005309972,0.001692284,0.002845755,0.001974551,0.002119401,0.003295499,0.001837784,0.002340352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003569403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004800018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00206466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00198733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9870321,0.006831652,0.0009907122,0.003178569,0.001579868,0.0003871223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8842751,0.08833944,0.01029893,0.01161282,0.003997338,0.001476365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004489481,0.0001756398,0.9453687,0.0001194119,0.001190899,0.0001374721,0.001357201,0.0008796561,0.000664717,0.00227262,0.003534414,0.04385037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001591176,0.0008071155,0.9754515,0.0001313379,0.0002845525,0.0007020765,0.002189134,0.01096102,0.0008230509,0.00368999,0.004744513,0.00005666386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9675446,0.0007050164,0.01359397,0.000494939,0.0002334206,0.0002809729,0.003766061,0.0001474218,0.01323351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941959,0.00007209822,0.003033265,0.00008616003,0.00003732258,0.0002898285,0.001388106,0.00004694676,0.0008502558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02862798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.151401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09477992963558438,"score_gpt":0.4341454355682537,"score_spread":0.3393655059326693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}