{"id":"W4403966310","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123105","title":"Stability and reliability of regional cumulative impact mapping: A Canadian Pacific case study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulative effects; Environmental science; Impact assessment; Marine spatial planning; Fishing; Marine protected area; Climate change; Reliability (semiconductor); Environmental resource management; Population; Cumulative distribution function; Geography; Habitat; Fishery; Statistics; Oceanography; Ecology; Mathematics; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008104977,0.0007364166,0.0005147858,0.00233297,0.0020335,0.002496925,0.002272172,0.0006746334,0.001084285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03793608,0.0003591586,0.0007456498,0.006936513,0.001783868,0.0009417116,0.001742132,0.0008180661,0.0001197577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01947701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01218476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9458766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9250371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967775,0.001055863,0.0001920782,0.0005360728,0.001003814,0.0004347261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815381,0.009417549,0.00117861,0.001484142,0.005951784,0.0004299118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004873526,0.0001333386,0.3546186,0.0003537247,0.000317163,0.001728115,0.003620017,0.537818,0.001384101,0.007728276,0.003839131,0.08797216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008295656,0.0002305639,0.2268227,0.0001969667,0.0003822995,0.0006366475,0.008260475,0.7449496,0.00270235,0.004920358,0.0106346,0.0001805001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.971706,0.0004373652,0.01245945,0.0007769336,0.00001572678,0.0002199696,0.003145624,0.0002567209,0.01098223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883233,0.0001835945,0.009824803,0.00002440816,0.000003618999,0.00004001634,0.0009739104,0.00003669564,0.000589593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0541234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1413162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0164526820529983,"score_gpt":0.2392525866698281,"score_spread":0.2227999046168298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}