{"id":"W4404029816","doi":"10.3171/case24421","title":"Branching and nonbranching intracranial aneurysms in the presence of a persistent stapedial artery and an aberrant internal carotid artery assessed with computational hemodynamics: illustrative case","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Neurosurgery Case Lessons","topic":"Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Aneurysm; Internal carotid artery; Posterior communicating artery; Anterior communicating artery; Medicine; Hemodynamics; Clipping (morphology); Cardiology; Radiology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004384101,0.0002137504,0.0004139509,0.0003482454,0.000156535,0.0001695872,0.00006982704,0.00005469386,0.000006068877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005452595,0.0001394859,0.0001592731,0.0002731717,0.0002049671,0.0004220084,0.0000217179,0.0006344998,2.219948e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003682316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001886298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007773432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001758253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983631,0.0002390727,0.0005822463,0.0002681126,0.0003390658,0.0002083739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983557,0.0009819408,0.0002334301,0.0001434408,0.0001431862,0.0001422365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002248553,0.001764603,0.02502854,0.0006298219,0.0005759851,0.9074184,0.02466635,0.005447705,0.01948128,0.0007870916,0.00007639643,0.01187532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001206872,0.001362386,0.02346926,0.0004092984,0.0003793694,0.8807229,0.002775855,0.08933011,0.00002985713,0.0001628769,0.000008653328,0.0001425066],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947392,0.0001689324,0.001444897,0.003017985,0.0002227558,0.0002932629,0.00005996648,0.00001243939,0.00004060272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988978,0.00003683313,0.0005363476,0.0002065528,0.0002798472,0.000008538522,0.000006723351,0.00002077808,0.000006574525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08388241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.568807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02511669513860539,"score_gpt":0.2904976467981774,"score_spread":0.265380951659572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}