{"id":"W4404142428","doi":"10.1002/tea.22001","title":"Evidence of graphical literacy in students' oral presentations: An example from undergraduate chemistry education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Mathematics education; Science education; Scientific literacy; Literacy; Chemistry education; Chemistry; Psychology; Pedagogy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03931004,0.00006230303,0.0001425855,0.001280549,0.0004657074,0.0009265534,0.001569688,0.00004834744,0.0001012873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004711678,0.00005442827,0.00004307323,0.003614476,0.001354746,0.004396037,0.0001013989,0.001175125,0.000003272895],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004075546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006918352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03733088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002313815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943275,0.001467671,0.0005264421,0.0003049933,0.002964618,0.00040879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966537,0.002190142,0.0001326596,0.0002041616,0.0005375215,0.000281855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006091431,0.0009779932,0.4738204,0.00006715248,0.000006618955,0.00002995414,0.3594592,0.000123253,0.02365759,0.0211375,0.0004964633,0.1201629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005408299,0.0002908501,0.3298347,0.005380022,0.00001078437,0.00002518108,0.4865302,0.003242635,0.001518891,0.1657872,0.006512852,0.0003257617],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907589,0.001086771,0.0001751706,0.0060196,0.0006445621,0.0001316363,4.415624e-7,0.000007545789,0.001175386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977002,0.0004348031,0.001314468,0.0000291555,0.0002936049,0.000006622694,4.761475e-7,0.000003622652,0.0002170629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1446497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3760626401744216,"score_gpt":0.6348201804315392,"score_spread":0.2587575402571176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}